Touch attacks[]
I have found that monk AC isn't lost from a touch attack even though it is stated as natural can anyone confirm this? WhiZard 06:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Commented retracted by WhiZard October 5, 2008, as it is no longer valid with 1.69.
Negative modifier[]
does the ac bonus get subtracted if there is a negative wisdom modifier i.e. wis 8? Mysticjester 11:02, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, always positive if applied. WhiZard 02:58, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
Class bonus[]
The latest addition implies that this feat is required for the AC bonus based on monk levels. Is this the case or is that hardcoded into the monk class? I thought this feat affected only the wisdom-based bonus. (Reminder to self: if it is hardcoded, the armor class article should not be listing it as a "feat" source of AC.) --The Krit 15:58, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- The level bonus is attached to the class, not to this feat. WhiZard (talk) 15:17, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Does this mean the bonus is applied to whichever class is in position 5 in classes.2da, and that the feat itself is only sort of an 'indicator' feat, like 'Quick to Master'? 76.126.70.158 08:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
- The bonus based on class levels would be tied to row 5 of classes.2da (without this feat monks still get the AC bonus for monk levels), but this feat does not describe the bonus based on class levels, making it hardly an indicator feat. The comment added in 2010 put a description of the bonus based on class levels into this article, but the note was removed because it did not pertain to the feat.WhiZard (talk) 15:18, September 22, 2013 (UTC)